Segway Ninebot E22 vs E2 - Same Family, Different Flaws: Which "Almost-There" Commuter Should You Actually Buy?

SEGWAY NINEBOT E22 🏆 Winner
SEGWAY NINEBOT

E22

550 € View full specs →
VS
SEGWAY NINEBOT E2
SEGWAY NINEBOT

E2

299 € View full specs →
Parameter SEGWAY NINEBOT E22 SEGWAY NINEBOT E2
Price 550 € 299 €
🏎 Top Speed 20 km/h 20 km/h
🔋 Range 22 km 25 km
Weight 13.5 kg 14.0 kg
Power 700 W 450 W
🔌 Voltage 36 V 22 V
🔋 Battery 184 Wh 220 Wh
Wheel Size 9 " 8.1 "
👤 Max Load 100 kg 90 kg
Speed Comparison

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

The Segway Ninebot E2 is the overall winner here, mainly because it gives you more range, better brakes, a nicer display and a lower price, all while staying just as urban and beginner-friendly as the E22. It is the more rational pick for short, flat commutes where you want a simple, low-maintenance tool, not a hobby.

The E22 still makes sense if you care more about the slightly lighter weight, marginally bigger wheels and its very clean stem-battery design, and if you can find it at a heavy discount. Taller riders may also prefer its cockpit feel.

If your rides are short, flat and budget-sensitive, the E2 is the better bet. If you're obsessive about portability and love the classic Ninebot stem aesthetic, the E22 is the one you'll grudgingly live with.

Now, if you want the full story - including what your knees, wallet and nerves will think after a month - keep reading.

Segway's E-series scooters are the everyday hatchbacks of the scooter world: you see them everywhere, nobody lusts after them, but somehow they keep the city moving. The E22 and the newer E2 both sit in that space - compact, sensible, almost stubbornly unexciting. I've put plenty of kilometres on both, enough to discover what the spec sheets politely avoid saying.

On paper they look surprisingly similar: modest top speed, compact frames, no-nonsense solid tyres and a clear focus on "last-mile" duty rather than cross-town epics. In reality, they go about that job in different ways. One leans on polished design and portability; the other quietly undercuts it on price while sneaking in a few smarter choices.

If you're torn between them, you're already the right kind of buyer: practical, mildly sceptical and not easily dazzled by wattage. Let's dig into which compromises hurt more - and which scooter hurts you less.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

SEGWAY NINEBOT E22SEGWAY NINEBOT E2

Both scooters live firmly in the entry-level commuter bracket: think short, mostly flat, urban rides of a few kilometres at a time, often combined with trains, trams or buses. They are meant for people who want to step on, press go, and not think about tyre pumps, bleeding brakes or suspension bushings.

The E22 is the "classic" lightweight Segway commuter: stem battery, very clean lines, slightly more premium feel, and a price tag that originally wandered into mid-range territory for what is, frankly, a very modest machine. It suits multimodal commuters and beginners who prioritise portability and a tidy aesthetic over comfort and performance.

The E2 is Segway's newer, budget-angled response to the flood of Amazon specials: cheaper, still recognisably Segway, with some smarter component choices (like a rear drum brake and that big dashboard) to keep it relevant. It's for people who look at the E22 and think, "Nice, but not at that price."

They share the same mission - short, simple urban hops - and if you're browsing one, you will absolutely be recommended the other. So yes, they're direct competitors, even if they arrived a few years apart.

Design & Build Quality

Specs Comparison

Pick them up side by side and you can feel they come from the same gene pool, but they've grown up in slightly different households.

The E22 is very "old-school Ninebot": battery in the stem, ultra-clean silhouette, almost no visible wiring. The deck is slim and tidy, the finish feels a touch more grown-up, and the folding pedal at the base gives it that "engineered object" vibe. In your hands, the frame feels solid and well put together; nothing rattles, nothing squeaks, and the cockpit has a nicely minimal, polished feel.

The E2 goes for a slightly more playful "surfboard" aesthetic with its low, thin deck and big, tilted display. Cables are still neatly routed, but you can tell cost-cutting has nudged it towards a more utilitarian steel-heavy frame. It's solid rather than refined. Good news: it still doesn't feel like a toy, and there's no obvious flex or bargain-bin plastics, but there's less of that "premium commuter tool" impression the E22 tries to give you.

In the hands and under the feet, both are well built for the money - especially compared to random no-name clones - but if you're sensitive to fit and finish, the E22 feels like the slightly more polished object. The E2, however, hits a better balance between cost and quality; you're not really losing anything important in day-to-day use.

Ride Comfort & Handling

Neither of these scooters will be recommended by your osteopath, but one is marginally kinder to your joints.

The E22 relies entirely on its dual-density solid tyres and frame flex. Those tyres are larger than what you'll find on the E2, and that extra diameter does help when rolling over cracks and small curbs. On smooth tarmac, it glides pleasantly and feels relatively composed. The moment you introduce rough pavement, cobbles or patchwork repairs, the E22 turns into a vibration transmitter. After several kilometres on bad sidewalks, your hands will be very aware you didn't pay for suspension.

The E2 technically has a little front spring, plus hollow solid tyres with some built-in give. In practice, that "suspension" is more PR than plushness. It takes the sharpest sting off impacts, but you still feel most of the surface texture through your legs. Its smaller wheels don't help; they fall into holes the E22's rubber sometimes just skims over. On cleaner asphalt, though, the E2's low deck and stable stance make it feel relaxed and easy to control.

Handling-wise, both are predictable and newbie-friendly. The E22's slightly bigger wheels and taller stance give it a bit more confidence on uneven surfaces, while the E2's low deck and surf-style geometry feel more playful and secure at slow speeds. On mixed city terrain, I'd give a very slight edge to the E22 for stability, but it's hardly transformative; they're both short-hop scooters that punish laziness in line choice.

Performance

Let's be honest: neither of these is going to impress anyone who has ever ridden a mid-range scooter, let alone a performance model. But for flat city duty, they're... acceptable.

The E22's motor feels tuned for smoothness rather than urgency. From a standstill, it eases you up to its legally-friendly top speed without any drama. It's fine in bike lanes and side streets, but past the first few rides you will wish it had just a bit more punch out of corners or away from traffic lights. Hills? It will tackle gentle ramps with a light rider and a full battery; anything steeper quickly turns into "kick-assist fitness programme".

The E2's motor is slightly weaker on paper, and you can feel that in steeper sections: it surrenders earlier on hills and you're kicking sooner. On flat ground, though, Segway has done a decent job with the throttle mapping, so acceleration feels similar in character - soft, predictable, never intimidating. Neither scooter rewards impatience; you ride them like fast pedestrians, not like light motorcycles.

Top speed sensation is identical: both hit the same ceiling and then just sit there humming along. If you're used to faster scooters, it feels glacial. If you're new to e-scooters, it's probably enough - at least until the novelty wears off and you discover you're consistently late to that faraway coffee shop.

Braking is where a clearer winner emerges. The E22 uses electronic braking on the front and an old-school stomp-on-the-mudguard rear brake. In emergency stops, that rear fender action is awkward and not particularly confidence-inspiring, especially for beginners. The E2, on the other hand, pairs electronic front braking with a proper rear drum brake - enclosed, weather-resistant, and much easier to modulate with your hand instead of your shoe. It's simply the more modern, more practical setup.

Battery & Range

This is where the E22's age really shows. Its battery is small even by entry-level standards, and while the marketing range figure looks fine on a brochure, real-world usage tells a duller story. Ride it like most people do - flat out, stop-start traffic, maybe a backpack - and your comfortable range shrinks to a short urban orbit. It's perfectly fine for classic "last-mile" duty, but not for much exploring beyond that.

The E2 quietly sneaks in a bigger battery, and it shows in practice. You still won't be crossing a metropolis, but you gain a noticeable extra stretch of usable distance over the E22 before the battery indicator starts bullying you. For commuters doing a few kilometres each way, the E2's range feels about right; with the E22, you start planning charging more cautiously if your commute has detours or errands.

Charging behaviour is another contrast. The E22's small pack refills in a few hours; it's realistic to top it up between morning and evening commutes at the office. The E2 takes much longer to go from empty to full, so it's more of an overnight ritual scooter. You're rewarded with more range, but you lose the flexibility of quick lunchtime "refuels".

In short: the E22 charges fast but doesn't go far, the E2 goes noticeably further but asks you to be disciplined about plugging it in.

Portability & Practicality

Here the differences are subtle but matter a lot if you carry your scooter more than you ride it.

The E22 is a touch lighter and you do feel it. Hauling it up stairs or onto trains is that little bit less annoying. The folding pedal at the base of the stem is genuinely convenient: click with your foot, fold, hook to the rear fender, done. Once folded, it's compact, tidy and, thanks to the stem battery, surprisingly well balanced in the hand. For pure carry-ability, it's one of the better designs of its era.

The E2 is slightly heavier, but we're talking the difference of a small laptop, not a bag of cement. The front latch folding system is classic Segway: solid, safe, but it can be a bit stiff, especially when new. Folded, it's still compact enough for public transport and small flats, just without that extra slickness of the E22's pedal latch. You won't curse it, but you won't admire it either.

In day-to-day practicality, both score well: small footprints, no chains, no messy grease, easy to stash under a desk. The E2's extra range makes it more forgiving if you forget to charge once. The E22 wins marginally if you're constantly lifting it over obstacles or storing it up several flights of stairs.

Safety

Safety on budget scooters is usually a story of "good enough if you're sensible," and both of these live in that territory, with a few important nuances.

As mentioned, braking is clearly better on the E2 with its rear drum. It gives you consistent, predictable stops in dry and wet conditions without asking you to learn the art of stamping on plastic at speed. The E22's electronic front and foot-operated rear setup works, but it's hardly confidence-inspiring under panic, especially for new riders.

Lighting is adequate on both: integrated front LEDs bright enough for being seen and for spotting basic obstacles on lit streets, plus rear lights that respond to braking. Neither replaces a good external light if you ride on unlit paths at night, but they're fine for city use. The E22's front light feels a bit more focused; the E2's is brighter than you'd expect for its class. Side reflectors on both help with junction visibility.

Tyre grip is where solid designs always compromise. The E22's synthetic "flat-free" tyres are tough but can be skittish on wet paint and polished stone. The E2's hollow solids behave similarly; they're better than hard plastic wheels, but still not in the same league as proper air-filled tyres when it comes to wet grip. In both cases, the scooter is more capable than the tyres allow; you ride them conservatively in the rain or you eventually learn the hard way.

Stability at top speed is acceptable on both. The E22's slightly larger wheels are marginally more forgiving over rough patches. The E2's low deck helps it feel planted in corners. Neither feels nervous in a straight line, provided you're not trying to ride one-handed while texting, which, to be clear, you shouldn't be doing on any scooter.

Community Feedback

Segway Ninebot E22 Segway Ninebot E2
What riders love
  • Very clean, minimalist design
  • Light and easy to carry
  • No-maintenance, puncture-proof tyres
  • Solid, rattle-free frame
  • Simple, intuitive controls and app
  • Quick charging for its range
What riders love
  • Excellent value for a big brand
  • Large, clear dashboard display
  • Rear drum brake confidence
  • Lightweight and portable enough
  • Maintenance-free hollow tyres
  • Modern, stylish look with good lights
What riders complain about
  • Harsh ride on rough surfaces
  • Weak hill climbing
  • Real-world range noticeably lower than claims
  • Slippery behaviour in the wet
  • Awkward rear fender brake
  • Customer support can be slow
What riders complain about
  • Struggles badly on hills
  • Bumpy on poor roads despite "suspension"
  • Modest top speed feels limiting
  • Real-world range below brochure promise
  • Very slow charging for the capacity
  • Performance drops as battery empties

Price & Value

This is where the E22 starts losing the plot a bit.

The E22 launched at a price point that nudged into territory where you can find scooters with bigger batteries, better comfort and sometimes even suspension. You're paying for Segway's ecosystem, over-engineered safety systems and refined design, but the hard truth is that on pure bang-for-buck, it's not spectacular. If you find it heavily discounted, the equation improves a lot; at or near its original price, it's harder to justify unless portability is absolutely top of your priority list.

The E2, by contrast, is much easier to defend. It's significantly cheaper while offering more real-world range, better braking, and that premium-feeling display, without sacrificing build quality. You still get the Segway ecosystem, spare parts availability and support - just in a more honest entry-level package. In the budget commuter space, it lands in that sweet spot of "good enough to keep, cheap enough not to regret."

Long term, both hold resale value better than generic brands, but the E2's lower purchase price makes it much less painful if you eventually outgrow it and move up to something faster and comfier.

Service & Parts Availability

One of the main reasons people keep buying Ninebots, despite more exciting options out there, is the ecosystem. Both the E22 and E2 benefit from this: spares, third-party parts and how-to guides are plentiful across Europe, and you're rarely more than a few clicks away from a replacement fender, controller or tyre.

Segway's official customer support is... let's call it "corporate". It exists, it works, but it can be slow and impersonal. With the E22 being older, there's a slightly deeper pool of community knowledge and used parts, but the E2 is very much in the mainline product stream, so support and availability are solid and should remain so for years.

For both models, the real trick is buying from a decent local dealer who will actually handle warranty work without sending you into email purgatory. In that regard, there's no real winner; they live in the same service universe.

Pros & Cons Summary

Segway Ninebot E22 Segway Ninebot E2
Pros
  • Very light and easy to carry
  • Clean stem-battery design, no messy cables
  • Larger solid tyres for a bit more stability
  • Quick charging for everyday commuting
  • Mature ecosystem, lots of community support
  • Simple, approachable for complete beginners
Pros
  • Much better value for money
  • Larger, clearer dashboard display
  • Rear drum brake feels safe and modern
  • Noticeably better real-world range
  • Still light and compact enough to carry
  • Strong entry point into Segway ecosystem
Cons
  • Mediocre range for the original price
  • Harsh ride on rough surfaces
  • Weak hill climbing, especially for heavier riders
  • Awkward rear fender brake in emergencies
  • Feels under-spec'd compared to similarly priced rivals
Cons
  • Long charging time for its battery size
  • Still bumpy on poor roads
  • Also poor on steeper hills
  • Solid tyres limit wet-weather grip
  • Taller riders may find bar height a bit low

Parameters Comparison

Parameter Segway Ninebot E22 Segway Ninebot E2
Motor power (rated) 300 W front hub 250-300 W front hub
Top speed ca. 20 km/h ca. 20 km/h
Claimed range ca. 22 km ca. 19-25 km
Realistic range (author estimate) ca. 14 km ca. 17 km
Battery capacity 184 Wh 220 Wh
Weight 13,5 kg 14 kg
Brakes Front electronic + rear foot Front electronic + rear drum
Suspension None (tyre only) Front spring (limited travel)
Tyres 9 inch dual-density solid 8,1 inch hollow solid
Max load 100 kg 90 kg
IP rating IPX4 IPX4
Approx. price ca. 550 € ca. 299 €

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

Both of these scooters are, in essence, polite compromises. They're light, reasonably well built, and very approachable - but they also stop just short of being genuinely impressive. Your choice is really about which set of compromises annoys you least.

If I had to recommend one for the average short-distance city rider, it would be the Segway Ninebot E2. The value is simply better: more usable range, better braking, a display you can actually read at a glance, and a price that doesn't make you feel you've paid mid-range money for entry-level performance. For students, casual commuters and "I just want something that works" buyers, it's the more defensible purchase.

The E22 still has a place, but it's narrower. If your priorities are maximum portability, slightly larger wheels and that very clean stem-battery look - and you manage to find it well below its original asking price - it can still be a perfectly serviceable last-mile tool. Think of it as the nicer-feeling, slightly under-ranged option for people who are carrying their scooter as much as they're riding it.

If your city is flat, your rides are short, and your budget has a sense of humour, go E2. If you're picky about design, obsessed with light weight, and realistically doing tiny hops with easy charging at both ends, the E22 can still make sense. Just don't expect either to blow you away - they're built to quietly get the job done, not to be the fun part of your day.

Numbers Freaks Corner

Metric Segway Ninebot E22 Segway Ninebot E2
Price per Wh (€/Wh) ❌ 2,99 €/Wh ✅ 1,36 €/Wh
Price per km/h of top speed (€/km/h) ❌ 27,50 €/km/h ✅ 14,95 €/km/h
Weight per Wh (g/Wh) ❌ 73,37 g/Wh ✅ 63,64 g/Wh
Weight per km/h (kg/km/h) ✅ 0,675 kg/km/h ❌ 0,70 kg/km/h
Price per km of real-world range (€/km) ❌ 39,29 €/km ✅ 17,59 €/km
Weight per km of real-world range (kg/km) ❌ 0,96 kg/km ✅ 0,82 kg/km
Wh per km efficiency (Wh/km) ❌ 13,14 Wh/km ✅ 12,94 Wh/km
Power to max speed ratio (W/km/h) ✅ 15,00 W/km/h ❌ 12,50 W/km/h
Weight to power ratio (kg/W) ✅ 0,045 kg/W ❌ 0,056 kg/W
Average charging speed (W) ✅ 61,33 W ❌ 29,33 W

These metrics put hard numbers on different aspects of value and efficiency. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km/h tell you how much performance and energy capacity you're buying for each euro. Weight-based metrics show how efficiently the scooter uses its mass to deliver speed, range and power. Wh per km captures how energy-efficient the system is in practice. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power reveal how strongly the motor is specified relative to the scooter's size, and average charging speed shows how fast you can realistically get back on the road.

Author's Category Battle

Category Segway Ninebot E22 Segway Ninebot E2
Weight ✅ Slightly lighter to carry ❌ A bit heavier
Range ❌ Shorter real range ✅ Goes further per charge
Max Speed ✅ Same, feels stable ✅ Same, equally limited
Power ✅ Slightly stronger motor feel ❌ Softer, weaker on hills
Battery Size ❌ Smaller capacity pack ✅ Bigger, more practical
Suspension ❌ Tyres only, no springs ✅ Small front spring help
Design ✅ Cleaner stem, more refined ❌ Slightly cheaper feel
Safety ❌ Foot brake awkward ✅ Drum brake inspires trust
Practicality ✅ Lighter, folds very quickly ❌ Slightly bulkier, slower fold
Comfort ✅ Bigger wheels help ❌ Smaller wheels, still harsh
Features ❌ Smaller, simpler display ✅ Large, info-rich screen
Serviceability ✅ Older, more guides online ✅ Mainline model, easy parts
Customer Support ❌ Same Segway bureaucracy ❌ Same Segway bureaucracy
Fun Factor ✅ Slightly more planted feel ❌ Feels more appliance-like
Build Quality ✅ Feels a touch more premium ❌ Solid but more basic
Component Quality ✅ Good cockpit, grips, finish ❌ More cost-cut compromises
Brand Name ✅ Same strong Segway badge ✅ Same strong Segway badge
Community ✅ Larger, older user base ❌ Smaller but growing base
Lights (visibility) ✅ Decent, integrated nicely ✅ Bright, effective in city
Lights (illumination) ✅ Focused beam adequate ✅ Bright for urban speeds
Acceleration ✅ Slightly stronger off line ❌ Gentler, more sluggish
Arrive with smile factor ✅ Feels a bit more "special" ❌ Very sensible, less charm
Arrive relaxed factor ❌ Range anxiety more present ✅ Extra range eases nerves
Charging speed ✅ Fast enough for desk top-ups ❌ Overnight or forget it
Reliability ✅ Proven, robust platform ✅ Similarly reliable design
Folded practicality ✅ Compact, balanced when carried ❌ Slightly less elegant folded
Ease of transport ✅ Easier up stairs ❌ Noticeably heavier in hand
Handling ✅ Bigger wheels, more forgiving ❌ Smaller wheels, more nervous
Braking performance ❌ Fender brake limits stopping ✅ Drum + e-brake work well
Riding position ✅ Taller, better for big riders ❌ Bars a bit low for tall
Handlebar quality ✅ Good grips, solid bar ❌ Feels slightly cheaper
Throttle response ✅ Smooth yet slightly stronger ❌ Softer, less engaging
Dashboard/Display ❌ Small, basic visuals ✅ Large, clear surf-style
Security (locking) ✅ App lock, common solutions ✅ App lock, same options
Weather protection ✅ IPX4, typical commuting use ✅ IPX4, similar behaviour
Resale value ✅ Older, recognised model ✅ Good demand, low buy-in
Tuning potential ✅ External battery options ❌ Fewer known mods
Ease of maintenance ✅ Very common, lots of guides ✅ Straightforward, Segway standard
Value for Money ❌ Weak at typical pricing ✅ Strong in budget segment

Overall Winner Declaration

Winner

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the SEGWAY NINEBOT E22 scores 4 points against the SEGWAY NINEBOT E2's 6. In the Author's Category Battle, the SEGWAY NINEBOT E22 gets 29 ✅ versus 19 ✅ for SEGWAY NINEBOT E2 (with a few ties sprinkled in).

Totals: SEGWAY NINEBOT E22 scores 33, SEGWAY NINEBOT E2 scores 25.

Based on the scoring, the SEGWAY NINEBOT E22 is our overall winner. Between these two, the E2 is the scooter I'd actually feel comfortable telling most friends to buy: it may be modest, but it's honest about what it is, and it doesn't ask for a premium it doesn't really earn. It quietly gets your daily grind done with fewer compromises where it matters - range, braking and price - even if it never once makes your heart beat faster. The E22 still has that slightly more polished, "designed object" feel, and if you value that above all else, you'll enjoy living with it - especially on short, predictable routes. But as a complete package for real commuters with real budgets, the E2 simply fits modern city life better.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.